Public attitudes 2024
Introduction
Since 2007, the Electoral Commission has been monitoring public attitudes about aspects of elections and democracy in the UK. Our latest study was conducted online in February 2024 with a representative sample of just under 6,000 respondents across the UK.
Summary of findings
- A majority of respondents were satisfied with the voting process and continued to express confidence that elections in the UK were well-run.
- Approximately one-third of respondents remained dissatisfied with the functioning of democracy in the UK, though there has been a slight improvement from last year.
- Concern regarding the impact of disinformation on UK general elections was widespread, with nearly all respondents believing it would influence voter behaviour.
- The majority of respondents who used social media reported encountering misinformation presented as news.
- There has been a decline in reported confidence in discerning the reliability of online content, particularly among respondents with lower educational attainment.
- Three-quarters of respondents felt that not enough action was being taken to address misinformation/disinformation.
- Politicians were more likely to be seen to be legitimate targets for behaviours that could be seen as intimidation and abuse (than members of the public) especially among younger age groups.
- While perceptions of financial transparency had stabilized at the UK level, there has been a decline in Scotland, where respondents were now the most negative in the UK regarding political parties' transparency in spending.
- Approximately two-thirds of respondents supported the requirement for photo ID to vote, with nearly half strongly endorsing the measure.
- There had been a decline in the proportion of people who found voting easy, largely driven by those opposed to the ID requirement.
- People from disadvantaged backgrounds are least likely to have voter ID.
Confidence and satisfaction with the electoral process
A majority of people (73%) remained confident that elections were well-run in the UK. This figure was consistent with last year's findings and was slightly higher than the long-term average.
80% of people were satisfied with the process of voting at elections, virtually unchanged from last year (79%). This represented an increase compared to the levels observed in the 2010s.
In general, how confident, if at all, are you that elections are well run? Data from 2012 - 2024
In general, how confident, if at all, are you that elections are well run? (Data from 2012 - 2024)
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the actual process of voting at elections? Data from 2012 - 2024
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the actual process of voting at elections? (Data from 2010 - 2024)
Confidence and satisfaction with the electoral process 2
Younger people are least confident that elections were well run, followed by the unemployed.
Respondents from some disadvantaged groups (those who rent from housing associations, those from DE social grade, those ‘limited a lot’ by disability and those with low educational attainment) were also more likely to have lower confidence that elections are well run.
In general, how confident, if at all, are you that elections are well run? (Broken down by demographic)
In general, how confident, if at all, are you that elections are well run? (Broken down by demographic)
Confidence and satisfaction with the electoral process 3
A similar proportion of people (38%) are satisfied with the way the democracy worked in the UK compared to those who are dissatisfied (36%). While this marks a positive change from last year, there is still significant room for further improvement.
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the actual process of voting at elections? (2023 compared with 2024)
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the actual process of voting at elections? (2023 compared with 2024)
Confidence and satisfaction with the electoral process 4
People who were ‘limited a lot’ by disability were the least satisfied with UK democracy, followed by people who were unemployed. Respondents who are not homeowners (either renting from housing association/private landlord or live at home) were also among those least satisfied.
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the actual process of voting at elections? (Net, satisfied - dissatisfied))
How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the actual process of voting at elections? (Net, satisfied - dissatisfied)
Misinformation a key concern
Misinformation/disinformation (70%) ranks as the public’s second largest concern around elections, behind only bias in the media (74%).
- Almost everyone (87%) thought that misinformation/ disinformation would affect how people vote in an upcoming UK parliamentary general election.
- There had been a significant increase in the proportion of people who reported encountering a deepfake in the last year: 43% had seen a deepfake photo, 42% had seen a video, and 30% had heard an audio clip. Last year, the overall proportion was 20% (when the question was not split into different formats).
- 77% of respondents who followed news on social media) said that they often encounter things that appear to be misinformation presented as news related to politics.
How often would you say you read/see things that appear to have been misinformation/ false information presented as news including relating to politics?
How often would you say you read/see things that appear to have been misinformation/ false information presented as news including relating to politics?
Misinformation a key concern 2
There has been a decline in the proportion of people who believe they can judge the reliability of online content. In 2022, 59% agreed they could judge online content's truthfulness, compared to 53% in 2024. The disparity is increasingly more pronounced among those with lower educational attainment.
When thinking about political information online, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 'I am able to judge whether what I read online is reliable or not'? (Broken down by educational attainment)
When thinking about political information online, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 'I am able to judge whether what I read online is reliable or not'? (Broken down by educational attainment)
Tackling disinformation
76% of people believed that not enough has been done to tackle mis/disinformation around elections, while 5% think sufficient action was being taken.
- Over half of people (55%) think that the Electoral Commission should be partly responsible for tackling election mis/disinformation, ranking fifth among seven suggested organizations.
Whose responsibility do you think it is to tackle misinformation around elections?
Whose responsibility do you think it is to tackle misinformation around elections?
Tackling disinformation 2
When asked to select a single organization primarily responsible, the Commission ranked third behind Ofcom and the UK Government.
Which of these do you think should have the primary responsibility to tackle misinformation around elections?
Which of these do you think should have the primary responsibility to tackle misinformation around elections?
Politicians seen as more legitimate targets for bullying behaviours, especially among the young
Bullying behaviours are more likely to be deemed acceptable if directed at a politician rather than a member of the public.
Younger people were more likely to find bullying behaviours acceptable, regardless of the target being a member of the public or a politician. The disparity in attitudes was also greater among young people.
On a scale from totally acceptable to unacceptable, how acceptable is verbal mocking from the public towards politicians and the public? (Broken down by age group)
On a scale from totally acceptable to unacceptable, how acceptable is verbal mocking towards politicians and the public? (Broken down by age group)
On a scale from totally acceptable to unacceptable, how acceptable is verbal threatening from the public towards politicians and the public? (Broken down by age group)
On a scale from totally acceptable to unacceptable, how acceptable is verbal threatening towards politicians and the public? (Broken down by age group)
Attitudes around financial transparency
Perceptions of financial transparency have experienced a long-term decline, though they have mostly levelled out in the last year.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements...
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements...
Attitudes around financial transparency 2
In Scotland, there had been an increase in the proportion of people who disagreed that the spending and funding of political parties/candidates/other campaigning organizations at elections was open and transparent. Since 2018, they had shifted from having the least proportion disagreeing to the most.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 'If I wanted to, I could easily find out how much political parties, candidates and other organisations spent on campaigning and how they were funded'? (Broken down by nation and year)
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 'If I wanted to, I could easily find out how much political parties, candidates and other organisations spent on campaigning and how they were funded'? (Broken down by nation and year)
Voter ID
- Two-thirds (65%) supported the requirement for photo ID to vote, with just under half strongly supporting the measure (46%).
- Last year, opinions on voter ID were more mixed, with 42% believing it would improve elections and 31% thinking it would worsen them.
- There has been a decline in the proportion of people who found voting easy (77% in 2024, down from 82% in 2022 and 2023). Those who oppose the ID requirement found it more difficult to vote (73%), those in support remained unchanged (82%).
- While there had been a small improvement (87%) in the proportion saying they feel voting in a polling station is safe from fraud or abuse in the last year, it remained consistent with the long-term average.
- 3% of the population did not have photo ID eligible for voting. Those who were unemployed, rent from a local authority or housing association, are limited a lot by disability, or are DE social grade were least likely to have photo ID.
Which, if any, forms of photo identification do you have?
Proportion of people who do not have a valid form of photo ID they are recognisable in (broken down by demographic)