Guidance for the GLRO administering the GLA elections

To help you meet any challenges, you will need to set up processes for effective co-operation and communication between the different ROs across Greater London.

You will also need to put in place detailed and robust plans for monitoring and maintaining integrity across the area.

There are several key points you should consider during your plans for these polls, including:

• the potential for any by-elections to be combined with the GLA elections
• turnout projections and how this impacts on all stages of your election planning
• the knowledge and experience among CROs and the processes involved at this type of election
• managing the candidates’ election address process including uploading to the website which contains the candidates’ campaign statements
• the knowledge and experience of candidates and agents, with the potential for a significant number of newer or less experienced candidates and the potential for more queries than you may be used to answering at other elections 
• any changes to the political landscape across all, or in parts, of the Greater London area and any impact this may have
• significant scrutiny from voters, candidates and the media and how you manage the expectations of any stakeholders with an interest in the result

These elections will bring their own particular challenges, and your work to deliver a well-run polls will come under considerable scrutiny – from voters, candidates and political parties, and the media.

Nature of the GLA elections

The elections involve co-ordination across a number of local authority areas including a co-ordinated public engagement strategy.

The evolving political landscape could mean that even in places where there have traditionally been large majorities, this may no longer be the case, meaning the focus and circumstances could be different from anything experienced at a GLA election before.

There may be a significant number of new or less experienced political parties, candidates and agents who are unfamiliar with the practices and processes of an election and who will need your support to be able to participate effectively. Even those who are more experienced may have limited experience of standing at a GLA election.

Given the possibility of close and hard-fought contests, you should be prepared for the integrity of the elections to be scrutinised. Allegations and cases of electoral fraud will not only have a negative impact on the confidence of electors and campaigners, but they may also have a significant impact on your capacity to manage the elections process effectively.

It is therefore crucial that you:

• put in place detailed and robust plans for monitoring and maintaining the integrity of the election
• work closely with the local police to ensuring you have in place good lines of communication for referring any allegations.

Scale and turnout

Many aspects of planning for the elections will need to reflect assumptions as to the likely turnout. Establishing such assumptions at an early stage in planning is of key importance as the scope for adjusting plans is limited at a later stage in the process. There are always challenges with developing such planning assumptions, with it often being difficult to predict in advance of the election period what the levels of engagement in the particular polls are likely to be. 

Given the potential for high levels of interest and engagement in the elections, some of which may not emerge until close to the polls, the potential for a high turnout should be reflected in all aspects of planning for the polls.

As the polls become closer, the context will continue to evolve as the campaigns pick up pace. You will need to be prepared to react to events which could have an impact on the effective delivery of the polls, and this will include having robust contingency plans in place that you can turn to where required. If, for example, there are televised debates, these could conceivably result in a late surge of registration and absent voting applications, as well as having an impact on turnout and could alter the traditional pattern of when completed postal votes are returned, which you should ensure that CROs, BROs and EROs across Greater London are prepared to respond to.

In any case, there is the potential for a high number of applications for registration and voter authority certificates to be made close to the deadline. This should be anticipated and built into CRO planning, reflecting the lessons learnt by EROs from the experience of recent electoral events. 

Turnout will also impact planning for the verification and count. It is vital that appropriate provision is made to ensure that verification and count processes are as accurate and efficient as possible. You will need to co-ordinate the timing and organisation of verification and counting to ensure that they are carried out in a timely and effective way across the Greater London area.

The media focus on the verification, count and declaration of results could be significant. It will be important to manage expectations, not only of the media but of all with an interest in the results, by consulting on your proposed approach and subsequently communicating clearly what you expect to deliver and by when, particularly where combination will impact on your expected result declaration times.