Measuring our performance
Our Corporate Plan aims to benefit the public, local electoral services, candidates, political parties, campaigners, parliaments and governments. We aim to deliver specific benefits for each of our five strategic priorities.
We will drive continuous improvements in our procedures and capabilities, and will measure how well we realise these benefits using a mix of quantitative and qualitative key indicators. These indicators included at Annex B (Table 2) have been categorised into two distinct groups: system indicators and performance indicators.
Key system indicators
Our key system indicators provide an assessment of the health of the wider electoral system. They are broad indicators, which are not entirely within our control, and where we work with many partners. However, the activities set out in this Corporate Plan are designed to help address the challenges highlighted, whether that is public confidence in and engagement with elections in the UK, or the intimidation of election candidates. We aim to work with the wide range of stakeholders who will influence these indicators and therefore expect to see a positive trend over time. These stakeholders include the UK’s governments, electoral administrators, civil society organisations, political parties, campaigners, other regulators, and the police.
For example, improving the accuracy and completeness of electoral registers to the levels highlighted at Annex B (Table 1) will require continued and strengthened efforts by Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) to contact and encourage people to register. But it will also require governments to develop new tools to help EROs – particularly new forms of automatic and integrated registration that rely on robust sources of data currently held centrally by governments or agencies.
We have proposed realistic - but ambitious - levels the whole system should aspire to achieve over the five-year lifespan of this Corporate Plan (to 2029/30). We will capture data for Great Britain, England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland as needed, and will update the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission, the Scottish Parliament and Senedd annually on progress. Our key system indicators are included at Annex B (Table 1).
Key performance indicators
Our key performance indicators are our service standards, which measure the way we are delivering services to the public, local electoral services, candidates, campaigners, political parties, parliaments and governments. We are using a mix of quantitative (measurable and specific) and qualitative (showing progress or improvement) metrics.
These indicators will enable us to keep track of our performance in achieving the outlined benefits within our strategic priorities on a year-by-year basis. Following best practice and building on our experience, we have set specific targets for first year of this plan (2025/26). For the first time, we are also setting aspirational fifth year targets that will reflect the impact of delivering this Corporate Plan over its five-year lifespan. We will update the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission, the Scottish Parliament and the Senedd annually on progress. Our performance indicators are included at Annex B (Table 2).
Programme and project measures
In addition to the two groups of indicators, we will also have programme and project measures. Our Portfolio Assurance Board (PAB) will approve the financial and/ or non-financial benefits which each project and programme is designed to deliver and the milestones for delivery. These will be tracked monthly and discussed each quarter with the Audit and Risk Assurance Committee of the Commission Board.
How we’ll monitor and assess our indicators
We will monitor and assess our indicators for each area of the UK – England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland – to take into account devolution and our accountability to different parliaments. We will keep all parliaments informed of the trends annually.
Annex A - cost analysis
Figure 1: Corporate Plan project costs analysed by Strategic Priority
| Financial years | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic priorities | 25/26 £m | 26/27 £m | 27/28 £m | 28/29 £m | 29/30 £m | Total £m |
| S1 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 10.5 |
| S2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 4.2 |
| S3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 3.3 |
| S4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 5.0 |
| S5 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 5.5 |
| Commission support costs | 2.0 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 14.6 |
| Total | 6.5 | 10.7 | 9.2 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 43.0 |
Figure 2: Five-year total Corporate Plan by funding parliament
Figure 3: Total Electoral Commission costs for the next five years
Financial assumptions
Inflation: Pay 2.5% increase in 2025/26 (based on CPIH target); non-pay 3.5% RPI increase in 2025/26. No assumptions in relation to inflation have been applied from 2026/27, given high levels of inherent forecasting uncertainty.
Pay review: Implementation of pay review increase in 2025/26, with performance pay implemented from 2026/27.
Core costs: No changes in baseline activities and headcount after 2025/26. Change activity and associated headcount are reflected in overall project costs. Cost increases reflect inflation in 2025/26, and impact of pay review (as above).
Event costs: Costs fluctuate depending on required resources for elections (and potentially referendums) in each year. Later year increases are predominantly related to assumptions on timing of the next UK Parliamentary general election
Capital spend: Assumed to remain broadly stable over the period.
Benefits: Figures currently exclude potential financial benefits associated with Corporate Plan projects. Anticipated financial benefits will be reflected in future annual funding rounds.
Contingency: £1.1m of contingency is included across Core and Event costs each year to cover additional costs, including any additional by-elections and other unanticipated occurrences.
Annex B - Key indicators for Corporate Plan 2025/26 - 2029/30
Table 1: Key systems indicators
| Title and description | 2024 data | 2025 data | Five year aspiration | Stakeholders | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satisfaction with the system of registering to vote (UK) | 82% | 86% | 90% | Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) UK governments and parliaments Civil society and other partner organisations |
| 2 | Accuracy of electoral registers (Parliamentary) | N/A | GB 88% (2022) NI 86% (2022) | 95% | Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) UK governments and parliaments |
| 3 | Completeness of electoral registers (Parliamentary) | N/A | GB 86% (2022) NI 83% (2022) | 95% | Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) UK governments and parliaments Civil society and other partner organisations |
| 4 | Perception that process of voting is easy (UK) | 77% | 82% | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Electoral administration suppliers Civil society and other partner organisations |
| 5 | Satisfaction with how democracy works in the UK | 38% | 47% | 75% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Political parties, candidates and non-party campaigners |
| 6 | Turnout at scheduled elections (compared to equivalent previous election) | N/A | 60% (2024 UKPGE) | 70% (UKPGE) | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Political parties, candidates and non-party campaigners Civil society and other partner organisations |
| 7 | Confidence that elections are well run (UK) | 73% | 79% | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Electoral administration suppliers |
| 8 | Perception that voting is secret (UK) | 73% | 75% | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments |
| 9 | Perception that voting is secure (UK) | 67% | 71% | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments |
| 10 | Perception that voting in general is safe from fraud and abuse (UK) | 83% | 85% | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Police forces and prosecuting authorities |
| 11 | Candidates who say they had no problem with harassment, abuse or intimidation | N/A | 44% (2024 UKPGE) | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Political parties Police forces and prosecuting authorities |
| 12 | Agreement that votes are counted accurately at elections in UK | 75% | 77% | 90% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Electoral administration suppliers |
| 13 | Perception that appropriate action will be taken by the authorities if a political party or a campaigner is found to be breaking the law on campaign funding (UK) | 36% | 40% | 75% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Political parties, candidates and non-party campaigners Police forces and prosecuting authorities |
| 14 | Agreement that the spending and funding of political parties, candidates and other campaigning organisations is open and transparent (UK) | 15% | 18% | 75% | Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Political parties, candidates and non-party campaigners Police forces and prosecuting authorities |
| 15 | Perception that political mis-information/dis-information is a problem | 70% | 69% | 25% | Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and Returning Officers (ROs) UK governments and parliaments Political parties, candidates and non-party campaigners Police forces and prosecuting authorities Social media platforms and digital companies Civil society and other partner organisations and regulators |
Table 2: Key performance indicators (service standards)
| Title and description | Target | Five year aspiration | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Respond to public enquiries via phone, letter and email within two working days (UK) Collected and reported separately for England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) | 98% | 98% |
| 2 | Respond to valid complaints within 20 working days | 90% | 95% |
| 3 | Awareness of the voter ID requirement – percentage of respondents who knew they need to bring ID to vote. Data collected for all major elections and referendums, which vary from year-to-year Collected and reported separately for nations within Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) | 90% | 90% |
| 4 | Electoral Administrator satisfaction (GB) - Returning Officer (RO) and Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) satisfaction with our guidance Collected and reported separately for nations within Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) | 95% | 98% |
| 5 | We publish donation/ loan reports and statements of accounts received by statutory deadlines (30 and 60 working days respectively) | 100% | 100% |
| 6 | Timeliness of advice to parties and campaigners, candidates and agents Collected and reported separately for England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Great Britain | 90% | 95% |
| 7 | Timely progression and conclusion of investigations, depending on category. Cat 1 (Simple): within 90 days; Cat 2 (More complex): within 180 days; Cat 3 (Highly complex): typically 365 days, with exceptions where external enforcement agencies are involved. | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | Timely service of initial sanction decisions and final notices (following representations period) within 28 calendar days | 90% | 95% |
| 9 | Respond to queries from police force single point of contact (SPOC) within set deadlines, depending on category. Cat 1: within three working days; Cat 2: within five working days; Cat 3: within 10 working days | 90% | 95% |
| 10 | Publication of election/ referendum reports within six months of polling day or last deadline for submitting spending returns Collected and reported separately for England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland | 100% | 100% |
| 11 | We respond to or comment on all policy proposals, legislative consultations and parliamentary inquiries within requested deadline | 100% | 100% |
| 12 | Respond to correspondence and parliamentary questions from Collected and reported separately for England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) | 100% | 100% |
| 13 | Satisfaction among members of parliamentary oversight bodies, key ministers and shadow spokespeople to whom we provide public affairs support | 70% | 80% |
| 14 | All staff working on an equality screening or Equality Impact Assessment (EqIAs), will receive training in assessing any impact on equality of opportunity and/ or good relations | 100% | 100% |
| 15 | Our financial statements in the Annual Report and Accounts (AR&A) receive an unqualified audit opinion from the Comptroller and Auditor General | Unqualified | Unqualified |
| 16 | Prompt laying of the Annual Report and Accounts (AR&A) in all three parliaments before the summer recess | Prior to summer recess | Prior to summer recess |
| 17 | Prompt invoice payment – undisputed and valid invoices paid within 10 working days | 90% | 95% |
| 18 | Respond to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests within statutory 20 working days or agreed extension | 90% | 95% |
| 19 | Staff engagement score | 70% | 75% |